In a surprisingly conservative move (and that’s a little c, folks), Colorado University fired faux-martyr Ward Churchill yesterday, defrocking the man of his tenured post and lectern.  For those who have forgotten this forgettable’s name, Ward thrust himself into the spotlight by referring to the victims of 9/11 as “little Eichman’s.”  His enormous and puerile ego welcomed the media coverage, but his lack of foresight led to a university investigation into his “credentials” that pulled the curtain on the academic hero, revealing him to be nothing more than a silly old hippie, fueling his lifestyle with the volatile anger and hatred of your typical anti-American college student.

I was bit miffed at his tasteless and vitiolic insult against 9/11 victims, but what really got my goat was the revelation that he crafted a story used by ulra-liberal high school teachers to sour the sweet taste of America’s identity in the minds of impressionable kids.  I recall a history teacher, Mr. Rasmussen, “enlightening” my class on the evils perpetrated by the U.S. government; the most impactful and effective tale was one of U.S. Army soldiers handing out to American indians (I refuse to bow to the PC Nazis) blankets infested with anthrax…a 19th century Auschwitz if you will.  It’s no wonder so many college freshmen and sophmores are so absolutely militant against our government.  (Note:  Mr. Rasmussen was a chronic closet alcoholic, and was released by the school after having a nervous and drunken breakdown in the middle of a class lecture).

And this is one of the reasons why the Regents at the University of Colorado canned Churchill: no historical record shows that our government ever distributed blankets with the intent of exterminating American indians, yet Chruchill made the claim in an essay published in 1994.  Mr. Rasmussen and other hate-filled “educators” never thought to question the veracity of this great lie; the hunger to legitimize their dusty and faded hippie ideologies clouded their better judgment, and they gleefully used Churchill’s fraud to influence teen-aged students and possibly spark another useless era of flowers and love.

I’ll never see an apology from Mr. Rasmussen, and I’ll bet my life’s income that no teacher will come forward and express his guilt over misleading kids into hating our government.  And that’s a shame, because it shows that their hearts aren’t telling them to educate, but rather to indoctrinate, and I’m certain many of them don’t feel the slightest bit of guilt over their errors…ends justifying means or some such nonsense.            

I guess what really depresses me is the hypocracy of so many liberal activists and voters.  Claiming that “Bush lied” and “Cheney manipulated the truth“, they march in the streets and burn the flag in protest.  Presented with hard evidence that Churchill lied as well, they clamor around him and defend his honor.  This is they way liberals work:  they fling handful after handful of poo, hoping to make everyone around them as filthy as possible.  The minute someone flings poo back, a terrible and outrageous injustice has occured.  They are able to bend the truth, to lie and to fabricate, because their cause is “just” and their enemy (liars and fabricators bending the truth) deserve destruction.  In their warped and negatively influenced minds, there are no consequences to  liberal action, only victims of conservative greed.  And their masterful manipulations ensure they’ll always be able to dodge and deflect guilt, using their pointing fingers to distract those around them from the truth.

Liberalism used to be a virtuous ideal, one that championed the rights of man and the virtues of truth.  Swooning from the power they stole in the 1960’s, they inadvertantly wrapped an anthrax blanket around themselves and are now too sick and too infected to recognize how deeply the rot has compromised their souls.  Their fever-induced-confusion tells them to march against the most benevolent government in the history of man; to criminalize virtuous people and virtuous actions; to justify the means by envisioning an impossible end; and to victimizing the guilty and prosecute the innocent. 

Watching Churchill go down is hardly satisfying, because he’ll simply claim to be a victim (again), and his supporters will blindly follow him and rally in his defense.  What’s the old adage about absolute power?  Doesn’t matter much, because only right-wingers like me can be corrupted, right?