NeoCon Hell » Blog Archive » A Long Train of Light and Transient Causes
Jun 26

Our federal government has but one purpose: to secure those natural rights granted to every human at birth.  To meet that end, it houses a State Department to promote friendly relations with neighboring nations; a Defense Department to deter aggressive nations; a Treasury Department to coin a common currency; a Justice Department to administer fair and equal law.  And of course it houses our Congress, a bi-cameral legislative body granted with the power to demand execution of federal rules codified through deliberation, and our Presidency, an office granted with the resources to execute Congress’ demands. 

Beyond these essential functions, the federal government is relatively limited in its power.  Not by law, I’ll grant you, but by reality.  Take, for example, Hurricane Katrina.  Ignoring causes posited by both partisan hackery and the astounding level of stupidity within our citizenry, the federal government failed to mobilize relief efforts in a reasonable time because the physics of a large govenment make a quick response impossible.  As a nation, we’ve grown accumstomed to the federal government being a large, cumbersome, wasteful and inefficient body.  We rarely put our faith in the government to do the right thing the right way, yet we respond to its failures as if some blatant betrayal has occured.

This is not to say that the federal government did not critically fail the residents of New Orleans, because they did…decades ago.  Its failure did not subject only cities so poorly planned as New Orleans to disaster, but every city in every united state regardless of its dominant race, class, or religion.  And it all began when Emperor Roosevelt the Second, aided by the advent of air conditioning in D.C., blitzkrieged the 10th Amendment with his acronym campaign. 

I admire President Rooselvelt; his wartime leadership was superb.  But I’d be remiss if I were to ignore his presidential encroachments.  While attempts to pack the Supreme Court with judicial yes-men and his rejection of President Washington’s 2-term tradition shocked his contemporary pundits, they are minor blips in comparison to his expansion of the federal government.  And it’s no coincidence that the federal government grew exponentially during FDR’s reign and once air conditioning had been installed in the Capitol building.  The stifling heat and humidity of Northern Virginia’s swamplands, so unbearable that they were donated to the federal government, had done a remarkable job of cleaning the D.C. streets of panty-waisted legislators during the summer months.  Like a fever prevents the growth of a body’s infection, thick and sticky air prevented the growth of our nation’s government. 

But let us not forget that we continued to re-elect FDR and his now full-time Congress, because we allowed the red devil on our shoulder to drown out the white angel on the other with the persuasive but incorrect notion that our great depression was a result of capitalism’s and federalism’s failure.  We allowed FDR to create administration after administration, social program after social program, duplicating and relegating to obsolescence state programs serving the same needs.  And we said nothing, marched nowhere, and failed to consider the long-term implications of such an obvious and destructive erosion to the tenets of federalism.

As the federal government’s purview grew, the state’s shrank.  No longer would states be required to create systems of self-sufficiency, because a rich uncle had appeared on the horizon with deep pockets and a big stick.  We neglected to indentify an inverse change in state govenment size.  We did not recognize that a state government with drastically reduced responsibilities should shrink, not grow or remain unchanged, and we even allowed state legislators to convince us periodically that their bodies needed expansion and increased funding to deal with concerns already being handled by Washington. 

And so we’re left with what we’ve got now: an enormous federal government, bloated and rotund, reacting to crisis with the agility of a Turkish oil tanker overloaded with granite; 50 state governments, missionless and powerless, reacting to nothing and working with intenal disharmony.  Instead of being forced to fund a federal social program not authorized in the Constitution, I should be forced to fund only those social programs my state legislature has been mandated to enact.  Yet I am forced to fund a myriad of federal social programs, and my state finds itself with nothing but free time and excess revenue it can now use to create programs that serve few beyond the legislators creating them.

Those who formed this nation knew that we “are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right [ourselves] by abolishing the forms to which [we] are accustomed.”  They also believed that “light and transient causes” should not by themselves bring about such abolishment, that only a “long train of abuses and usurpations” upon our natural rights warrants revolution.  I disagree.  A single ant may not require expensive extermination efforts, but an endless colony of ants, each seeking a benefit gained only through confiscation of a crumb of personal property here, a grain of nautral rights there, will render us powerless against things bigger and more destructive.

I understand the necessity of evils such as governments, taxes, legislators, and laws.  Do not mistake my words as condemnation of our federal government or its leaders.  Problem is, I can’t find our federal government, and its leaders are visibly absent.  All I can see is an endless column of hungry ants and a colony growing quickly towards a critical mass.  Chew on that, Sandra Day.                     

                  

1 Comment

  • I remember those days during and following WWII and the pride we all felt from being the strongest and best. From a nation half the size in population as we are today, we fought tyranny around the world and beat it. We were the only nation that fought and were victorious on two fronts. Had we wanted to do so, and there were a number of people that did, we could have engaged the Soviets with, no doubt, the same outcome. However, we were war weary and chose to wage a cold war against the Soviet Union which we also won under Ronald Reagan’s leadership some years later.

    WWII was not a phoney war as those that came afterwards turned out to be and most especially the blunder into Iraq, but a real struggle against forces determined to deny mankind the rights inherent in their being. In the world in general, the concept of individual liberty and freedom is indeed a rare thing and first saw the light of day in the philosophy of John Locke in 1695.
    Fortunately for us here in the United States, our Founders were conversant in Locke’s philosophy and interwove it into our most precious documents - the Decalaration of Independence and the Constitution of the Unites States of America. In fact, had Jefferson had a computer at the time, he would have cut and paste portions of the Declaration directly from Locke’s treatise on civil government and applied a minimum of word smithing to it.

    Washington, Adams, Franklin and Jefferson were all men of substance and they used their wealth to good advantage in that it gave them the time and opportunity to analyze world governments, philosophies and religions and determine what was good and what was bad about them. They were practical men, but they were also deep thinkers and the product of their collective thinking became the law of the land as embodied in the United States Constitution. One would be exceedingly hard pressed to find among any generation of men that followed, the organizational genius of our Founders. Yet, in 1914, there emerged in the United States, people who must have thought themselves to have such genius for they managed to change our governmental
    structure through the ratification of the 17th Amendment to the Constitution. The fact that this set of geniuses were short sighted didn’t occur to them then, nor to many today, but the change that was made, though seemingly trivial, has had a profound effect, over time, on the business of our country.

    The consequence of the 17th Amendment was to upset the balance of government between its republican attributes and its democratic attributes, in favor of the latter. By so doing, and over the intervening years, we have moved closer and closer to becoming a democracy and as our Founders, and most particularly Franklin, would have told us, democracies do not last.

    The impact on America from this change was to make an important and integral part of our legislative branch vulnerable to the corruptive practices exerted on it by corporate and special interest group lobbyists. The thought of our Founders was to isolate the United States Senate from the day to day influences of the populace and, therefore, have them determine the merits of any changes offered by the House of Representatives in a deliberative process taking into account how proposed changes might influence the philosophical basis of our government. In other words, they were the safeguards needed to preserve and insure that the United States Government functioned as it should. Remember these words from the Declaration of Independence:”Prudence indeed will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient Causes”. Even so, in 1914 the people did not heed this warning.

    One should also keep in mind that the United States Senate through its review process determines the suitability of other members of our government such as, for example, the Justices of the Supreme Court.

    Today, our government is broken. Senators, rather than attending to the real business of government as assigned to them, must, instead, scurry about looking for the money necessary for their reelection. In the meantime, and understanding the financial burden placed on the members of the Senate for reelection all too well, corporate and special interest group lobbyists are only
    too eager to lend a financial helping hand. If their offers are rejected and the corporation sponsoring these lobbyists perceive that a Senator is in opposition to their wishes, what do you think happens? They will fund their opposition in the next election. What is even more damning is that through this reelection finance bribery, a well funded corporation can direct the future of our country by successfully bribing a mere 51 people. Think about that! Has our Liberty and Freedom so little
    thought of that it can be manipulated, even eroded, for a relatively few well placed dollars? How about the placement, for life, of Justices in the Supreme Court? The undue influence exerted by lobbyists on our government has to stop and it has to stop permanently. The only way that this can be done is to restore our government to its original structure as designed by our
    Founders by the repeal of the 17th Amendment

Leave a Reply